Home
Twitter
RSS
Newsletter
Jeremy Jastrzab
04 Nov, 2008

Gears of War 2 Review

360 Review | Team Delta returns, bigger and better than before.
For a long time after its original release in November 2006, Gears of War was the technical front runner on the Xbox 360 and the shining beacon for technical prowess in the HD generation. To date, it was one of the best exponents of the overused Unreal III engine. It also provided an intense and visceral gaming experience that had players hanging on to the edge of their seats. Two years later and fresh off the surprisingly competent Unreal Tournament III port, Epic are back with the follow-up to one of best sellers on the Xbox 360, in Gears of War 2.

Off the bat, Gears of War 2 has number of improvements over its predecessor. In particular, the story is much stronger and delivered in a much more meaningful manner, though knowledge of the original is recommended. The story will never be deep enough to compare with a game such as GTA IV or Metal Gear Solid 4, as there is still a lot of meat-head military banter flying around. However, the constant doubt seeded in the player’s mind over which faction, the humans or the Locust, is actually winning or doing the ‘right’ thing, as well as the deeper character development and one heck of a wild ride is what makes for a more exciting and fulfilling narrative, even if a few things are left unexplained or don’t make sense.

The addition of colour is nothing to smirk at.

The addition of colour is nothing to smirk at.
Close
Overall, Gears of War 2 is a better game, though essentially the same one as its predecessor. There have been some minor improvements, though given the success of the original, the development team obviously went with the old mantra ‘if it’s not broken, don’t fix it’. Thankfully, a few of the things that were broken have been fixed, to an extent. While Gears of War 2 provides the same type of visceral and intense action of its predecessor, it does so with an increased level of variety and a stronger design. Still, not everything is quite where you’d expect it to be, especially for such a blockbuster title.

The crux of Gears of War had players moving taking control of either the main protagonist, Marcus Fenix or his squad mate Dom Santiago, through numerous situations involving the use of cover and stop-and-pop gunplay. Gears of War 2 follows a similar structure, though there is an added variety to the situations that you’ll encounter. While said variety is stronger in the first half of the game, there are numerous memorable and exciting set pieces that the player really has to experience for themselves to make the most of them.

It’s not all stop-and-pop, as there are a few curly situations through out the game. These include a sequence where you’re required to manufacture your own cover from 'razor hail', carry an explosive box with a partner and protect your partner from automated security systems. The most interesting one was where you had cover that you have to ‘move’ in order to protect your partner and that was certainly the high point of variety. Furthermore, there are a few more boss fights and they’re much more exciting and breathtaking this time around. There are a couple of vehicle sequences, though the main one is very frustrating due to very slippery controls and a couple of trial-and-error parts. There other two, well, you’re best off seeing them for yourselves. A few other minor additions to the games arsenal include a poison grenade, boom shield, flamethrower, Gatling gun and Mortar cannon.

Yeah, that's going to work.

Yeah, that's going to work.
Close
The major improvements come from the friendly AI and difficulty curve. Believe it or not, you now actually have AI partners that are useful. They’ll take cover as required and actually help you pick off enemies. Even though they are still prone to gaffs (such as a reluctance to rush to revive you), this improvment is the most welcome. Sometimes when you’re lost, they’ll line up at the place where you’re meant to go next, which is quite handy. It certainly makes for a less frustrating game, though not necessarily an easier one. The difficulty curve is much smoother this time around. The set pieces aren’t so erratically difficult, so you’re only likely to be repeating the one sequence a lot at the back end of the game.

If your main beef with Gears of War was the control scheme, then you’re not going to like it any better this time around. Apart from the addition of a few finishing animations, the controls in the sequel are the same as before. However, the level design is much stronger now, so their limitations are not as exposed as they were before. This holds true for most of the game, as there were far fewer moments where we were left for dead. However, there were times were the A button assigned to everything would do something that we didn’t want it to, such as jump when we actually wanted to run.

The single player experience in Gears of War 2 is an unrelenting 10 to 12 hour ride that only lets up once the final credit has rolled past and is a more enjoyable experience than the original. However, the whole freshness and aspect of ‘new’ that came with the first game won’t really come across here unless you haven’t played the original. Unfortunately, for a game as high profile as this one, there seems to have been something missed in QA. Through out our play through, we had to restart at the last checkpoint no less than three times through the one play through because of glitches. Once was because our vehicle got stuck and once because Dom decide run off a platform and the game leaving us stuck. As complicated and ambitious as the title is, and while not necessarily game breaking, such occurrences are unacceptable in this day and age.

My what a big gun you have.

My what a big gun you have.
Close
While the single-player experience has improved thanks to a better AI and design. However, the game is still best played with a partner in co-op. Still catering for the two players, you’ve got similar options such as split paths and the ability to revive one another if need be. However, there aren’t a lot of split paths this time around and there isn’t too much done with them outside of the first and second chapters, which is somewhat disappointing. Basically, they seem like they’ve been put there for the sake of it later in the game.

Gears of War multiplayer sessions were some of the most frequented on Xbox Live and without a doubt, Gears of War 2 will be no different. There are now eight different game modes, including those that are new and improved, as well as the ability to have up to ten players in a match, over the previous eight. Furthermore, bots can now be employed to fill in any missing spots. Micro additions to the gameplay include the ability to pick up down players and use them as shields, as well as the ability to crawl while incapacitated, in the hope that a nearby team mate will revive you.

In addition to modes such as ‘Guardian’, where you can only respawn if the designated guardian is still alive and ‘Submission’, where the ‘flag’ is a stranded NPC with a gun, you have a co-op mode called ‘Horde’. Here, up to five players fight off wave after wave of invading Locust. This goes on for 50 waves, though you can save after every five. Overall, the additions and refinements to the multiplayer are sure to be a hit. However, there are reports of issues such as host advantage and lag. With regards to the latter, it is unknown whether this is related to the lack of players at the moment, or whether it will get worse once everyone else hits. Either way, anything less than a stellar performance is disappointing, particularly given Epic’s track record with online multiplayer.

Here comes the Horde.

Here comes the Horde.
Close
As mentioned in our hands-on preview last month, the addition of colour and vibrance makes for much more visually appealing experience. Gears of War was and still is one of the best looking HD titles available and Gears of War 2 now has the one-up on it. We could write another entire review on the visuals alone, though we’ll just say that when a developer can fit this much eye-candy onto the one DVD, those crying about disc space need to utilise their programming skills better. Disappointingly, there are a few weird glitches that pop-in and take away a little from what is otherwise brilliant looking game. The audio is very intense, loud and will definitely give you surround sound a good work out. The sound track for the game is actually quite exciting and suits the game very well, though aspects such as the voicing and the like are fairly typical. The actual use of the sound could have been a bit better, as sometimes it can be hard to tell where a noise is coming from.

Even though Gears of War 2 is very close follow-up to the original blockbuster, it has made a number of the necessary additions and improvements that make it a better experience overall. The campaign is a wild ride with some amazing sites and sounds, while the multiplayer experience promises to be everything that the original provided and more. While not as ‘new’ as the original, and with what seems to be a disappointing lack of polish, what with the minor glitches that have crept in, there aren’t many other experiences that will come out over this holiday period that will provide the same intensive ride that could only be pulled off by a skilled developer such as Epic. Unless you really didn’t like the scheme from the last game, Gears of War 2 is one of the most viscerally enjoyable experiences you're likely to have this holiday season.
The Score
Gears of War 2 is one of the most intense and viscerally enjoyable and sensually appealing gaming experiences that you'll likely have this holiday season.
Looking to buy this game right now? PALGN recommends www.Play-Asia.com.

Related Gears of War 2 Content

Gears of War 2 DLC going cheap
13 Oct, 2010 Another massive bargain for Xbox Live.
Xbox Avatars getting Gears of War armour
26 Jul, 2009 Finally a chance to look like Marcus Fenix.
Gears of War 2: Dark Corners DLC screens
22 Jul, 2009 Not as dark as you might think.
83 Comments
3 years ago
savage163 wrote
And i also said that reviwes shouldnt have a number at the end, Which means you have to read the review and understand why that paticular person didnt like about it and then we all can judge for ourselfes and not be bound to the judgemnet of reviwer thats why i go to Multiple reviews and this show why scores shouldnt even come in to play becuase i just read the review again and the the review was pretty positive and the score dosent fit the quality of the game and review.
I also wish reviews didn't have a number at the end so people don't complain when a game gets rated 0.5 below their expectations.
3 years ago
I rate this thread 8.5. It's one of the best threads of the year, but it doesn't compare to a Full Auto 2 review.
3 years ago
savage163 wrote
I cant quote for some reason but this goes to evce


Obviously you didnt get the jist of what i said, I meant that this guys is entiled to his opinion which is all good but i wont be reading reviews that dont cater to the core and non core demagraphic of the game and have found Ign and Gametrailers to be a source of better reviews which give a fair and balanced review with a score that fits the actual review im just dissapointed that this AAA has scored AA by this lone review and from the expereince i have had as with many others i just think its odd the score it got given the review sounds like a AAA and has scored AAA everywhere so i will scratch my head disregard the review and look at some other reviews.


And i also said that reviwes shouldnt have a number at the end, Which means you have to read the review and understand why that paticular person didnt like about it and then we all can judge for ourselfes and not be bound to the judgemnet of reviwer thats why i go to Multiple reviews and this show why scores shouldnt even come in to play becuase i just read the review again and the the review was pretty positive and the score dosent fit the quality of the game and review.

I Honestly belive that we should have 2 reviews with game say a person who dosent like them games and someone who does and not include a score but i dont think were going to get that.

Also im not worried that gears 2 wont be viewed at one of the best games this genaration but for some stupid and dont ask me why but im more dissapointed that it was an Australian website that gave a score that wasnt fitting the written review and game itself which the game is really growing on me.
Yeah, IGN and Gametrailers have better reviews. GTA4 10 out of 10 and IGN's infamous 9.1/10 for PES2008 last year despite it having shocking lag and bugs. Yeah they are better reviewers.

Of course like many young gamers you basically expect these blockbuster games to be given overwhelmingly positive reviews. So when one reviewer doesn't follow the trend and is hard hitting in his review because he expects more from a big budget game, some folks cry foul.

Well then that is a problem with the current state of gaming reviewing then isn't it. That there are a lot of soft ball reviews that a generally fair review seems harsh because of its lower score compared to others.

Look at the quality of film reviews and take a look at the many blockbuster movies that have average scores. Some of the highest grossing films of all time, like Spiderman 2, 3 Pirates of the Caribbean and some Star Wars movies have average review scores and are a prime example of how film reviews/reviewers are not influenced by hype.

Its because of the fact that, since there have been so many movies produced movie reviewers have now set a high standard for what they expect from a good movie. Thats why a lot of big budget and highly grossing movies have poor reviews none the less. Because film reviewers have drawn a clear line between what is considered a masterpiece eg The Godfather and what is conceder crap, eg Pirates of the Caribbean 3 .

Unfortunately that is what is missing in a lot of game reviews especially of big budget games. High standards of reviews. You have Gametrailers for example, slatting GOW2 for having a few notable bugs and a not so spectacular story, and not much improvement from the original Basically the same criticisms from many reviewers including Jeremy. But they still give the game a 9. That is nothing more than a softball review.

Understandably film reviews are of a higher quality than game reviews as the gaming industry is still young. A lot of reputable film reviewers are the older wiser folks whilst game reveiwers are predominately white males in their 20's and 30's.

So hopefully game reviewing will improve with time, and at the same time more folks like you savage163 wake up and realise that a lot of game reviews have been soft on the big titles and start demanding more from games like Jeremy did in his review. After all, games are not cheap so we are justified to expect more quality from these games.
3 years ago
Yeah, IGN and Gametrailers have better reviews. GTA4 10 out of 10 and IGN's infamous 9.1/10 for PES2008 last year despite it having shocking lag and bugs. Yeah they are better reviewers.

I said i have found them better not to be better, So idk know what you are talking about and i didnt bother with the Pes review so that review had no affect on my comments and Alot of places gave Gta a 10 so idk what you beef is with that and i understand this site gave it a 9.5 which is the next best thing to a 10.

Of course like many young gamers you basically expect these blockbuster games to be given overwhelmingly positive reviews. So when one reviewer doesn't follow the trend and is hard hitting in his review because he expects more from a big budget game, some folks cry foul.

I never said enything about hype i judged my response on what i played and it easy felt like a AAA title and if they didnt have a score at the end of the review i to would of thought that they reviwed it as an AAA title which Epic have done everything required imo to do so but the reviewer despite how good it was made out to be my himself made it a AA game which dosent make sense to me and made the review a little odd but for the rest of your post it would make sense if i just based the game on hype off the previous game and not by playing Geow 2 but i did so the rest of the post dosent even work but im having a hellva ride with gears 2 and imo its easily AAA and i will disregard the score at the end of the review.

I just want to say that i know some revewing scores have a diffrent meaning even if it scores the same but basicaly there pretty simalr but in the end id rather have no score and just read the review.
3 years ago
GooberMan wrote
I rate this thread 8.5. It's one of the best threads of the year, but it doesn't compare to a Full Auto 2 review.
8.5? So it's a flop?
3 years ago
James wrote
GooberMan wrote
I rate this thread 8.5. It's one of the best threads of the year, but it doesn't compare to a Full Auto 2 review.
8.5? So it's a flop?
This exact thread on IGN would get at least a 9.
3 years ago
HAHA, sure gears of war 2 is a good game. Not a great game but playable none the less. What i find funny is for one, the kid who said "the sequel to my favourite game of all time" you do realise that when you sign up to this site, you agree to the terms and conditions, clearly stating that you are above the age of 13. Im sorry he may not have been able to afford a n64 (occarina of time, golden eye) or a playstation 1 (tekken 3, mgs, resident evils)even back to the snes etc. What those games did with story lines, considering they were running 64 and 32 bit graphics make the vast majority of todays storylines and gameplay laughable. If you want games with juicy graphics and crappy controls sell your 360 and your body for a few years, save up and buy yourself a hdtv and ps3. Your all bitching about the 8.5 this score encompasses all aspects of the game, including graphics, playability, bugs/glitches, sound/soundtracks, multiplayer etc. Depending what you like in a game you may or may not agree...unless your a fanboy, you just loes all credibility..p.s whithout a doubt the best game ever on the xbox series was the original halo. Flame me now bitches
3 years ago
The_Mo wrote
Flame me now bitches
The_Mo wrote
you do realise that when you sign up to this site, you agree to the terms and conditions, clearly stating that you are above the age of 13.
Seems you ignored it.
3 years ago
Played through in co-op and played a couple of hours of horde. 8/10. Unoriginal but pretty good. It looks like an expansion for GoW1. Hell, it could be worse. Just look at Halo3, "One small step nowhere for man, one giant leap for fanboys."
Add Comment
Like this review?
Share it with this tiny url: http://palg.nu/sj

N4G : News for Gamers         Twitter This!

Digg!     Stumble This!

| More
  Pre-order or buy:
    PALGN recommends: www.Play-Asia.com

Australian Release Date:
  7/11/2008 (Confirmed)
Standard Retail Price:
  $99.95 AU
Publisher:
  Microsoft
Genre:
  Shooter
Year Made:
  2008

Read more...
Currently Popular on PALGN
Australian Gaming Bargains - 08/12/11
'Tis the season to be bargaining.
R18+ Legislation
R18+ Legislation
Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Generations Preview
Hands on time with the game. Chat time with the CEO of CyberConnect 2.
PALGN's Most Anticipated Games of 2007
24 titles to keep an eye on during 2007.
PALGN's Most Anticipated Games of 2008
And you thought 2007 was populated.