Home
Twitter
RSS
Newsletter
Goldeneye reimagining rumour
This forum is locked you cannot post, reply to or edit topics   This topic is locked you cannot edit posts or make replies    PAL Gaming Network Forum Index
   -> General Forums, Archive
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jarrod




Status: Offline
Joined: 07 Dec 2007
Posts: 8284
$poons: 369.60
Location: Preston
australia.gif

PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:58 am    Post subject: Goldeneye reimagining rumour Reply with quote

Goldeneye reimagining rumour by Jarrod
PALGN Rumour: Like Bond himself, this rumour just wont die.
[View Article]

Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
bernietoast




Status: Offline
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 58
$poons: 0.60
Location: NSW, Sydney
australia.gif

PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
0

Vote:
I think this game was great for its time, but I think if they do a reboot as some people suggest the end result has a very high chance of falling short of peoples expectations.

I think the best thing they could do is update the graphics and release on wiiWare instead.
Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message
Jaws




Status: Offline
Joined: 28 Oct 2006
Posts: 2373
$poons: 536.90
Location: Perth, WA
australia.gif

PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
0

Vote:
I agree bernie. Dress it up, address previous hardware limitations and release it for PSN, Live and WiiWare and you'll have a winner. A shame that the stakeholders refuse to agree on it.

A 'reimagining' would kill it (especially if Activision are solely involved).
Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message MSN Messenger
The Brett




Status: Offline
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 970
$poons: 47.60

blank.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
0

Vote:
Man, this game kicked arse back in the day. But I played it again recently and OH GOD IT WAS TERRIBLE. I seriously just wouldn't buy the same game with updated graphics so a reimagining might work with a whole new engine. Feels wrong though.
Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message
Nietzsche




Status: Offline
Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Posts: 2543
$poons: 119.80
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Earth
blank.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 4:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
0

Vote:
It's never going to happen, to many licenses tied up
Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message
Jarrod




Status: Offline
Joined: 07 Dec 2007
Posts: 8284
$poons: 369.60
Location: Preston
australia.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
0

Vote:
Nietzsche wrote:
It's never going to happen, to many licenses tied up


Hence reimagining icon_razz.gif. The re-release of Goldeneye is in development hell due to the split license, but a re-imagining of Goldeneye is theoretically possible. Activision hold the rights to the Bond franchise. Rather than rebuild Goldeneye they'd be making their 'own' Goldeneye.

No reuse of assets or design. Legally, they could do it.
_________________


Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
Nietzsche




Status: Offline
Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Posts: 2543
$poons: 119.80
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Earth
blank.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
0

Vote:
I doubt it. It was made on a Nintendo console by Rare and then you have the whole Bond mess of a license which while activision holds the current Bond license I don't think they hold the license for Goldeneye. Legally you would need a whole mess of people to sign up on it and then you have the fact that the game is so old and Perfect Dark which is the same game play was criticized for that game play when it was re-done.
Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message
LeonJ




Status: Offline
Joined: 29 Sep 2004
Posts: 10312
$poons: 1868.80
Location: Grand Line
australia.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 6:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
0

Vote:
Do they realize that a Golden Eye remake would flop anyway?

I mean, I think some games are probably left in our memories.
_________________
Shin J Leon.

XBL - LeonJ
PSN - LeonJ

Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Jarrod




Status: Offline
Joined: 07 Dec 2007
Posts: 8284
$poons: 369.60
Location: Preston
australia.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If Activision were to literally recreate the exact same game then yes, there would be legal issues.

But Activision own the rights to Bond related game development. Nintendo/Rare/Microsoft own rights to the Goldeneye that was released on the N64, not Goldeneye as an intellectual property. The code, the level design, and the conceptualisation of Goldeneye N64 is untouchable at the moment.

However, Activision could legally create a new James Bond game titled "Goldeneye", and again have it based off the same film, having levels set in similar locations, similar weapons, and a similar plot. If they directly copy the game then there will be problems, but if they make "Goldeneye Wii" based off the movie then they're not technically breaking any copywrite laws.

Microsoft and Nintendo couldn't do this because the only license they hold is 'Goldeneye N64', not the film and not the bond franchise, only the material that was specifically developed for that game, such as the art assets and level design. Everything else Bond related falls in Activision's court.

If this rumour is true it likely will not feature the same level design as Goldeneye N64. It wont be a 'remake' persay. Instead it will be a reimagining; a new Bond game based off the Goldeneye film, that by default will share similarities with the previous game, but not actually 'copy' or borrow assets and design.
_________________


Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
XtremeXfactor




Status: Offline
Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 1339
$poons: 180.40

blank.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
0

Vote:
It has got to be better than Goldeneye: Rogue Agent (EA) icon_razz.gif

*** I thought Quantam of Solace (ps3/x360 etc) was a decent game, will be interested to see the end result.
Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
A13x




Status: Offline
Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 3362
$poons: 2126.10
Location: Adelaide
australia.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
0

Vote:
Wow, so they're just banking on all the people who played Goldeneye on N64 buying the new version, and most people won't know it's by a different developer or anything, so no doubt it'll sell well on nostalgia alone in the major market.

Meanwhile the rest of us are all screaming out agonisingly as it becomes a top seller, despite being a crappy movie game based on one of the best games of the earlier days, but re-released by probably the pinnacle of greed in the gaming industry, no doubt to be followed by Goldeneye 2: The Goldening, Goldeneye 3: Bond's Revengance, and Goldeneye: Modern Espionage.

Eurocom developed The World is not Enough on N64, which in my time playing, was awful in comparison to Rare developed Goldeneye and Perfect Dark, as well as 007 Nightfire, Predator: Concrete Jungle, Olympic games series and numerous sub-par movie tie-ins. My confidence in this title's quality is lower than something that is very close to the ground, like a dachshund .
_________________

<3
Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message Visit posters website MSN Messenger
Sin Ogaris




Status: Offline
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 10616
$poons: 1588.60
Location: Melbourne
australia.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
1

Vote:
mikezilla2
I thought Goldeneye was great for features but the actual gameplay was terrible. Having to stop to aim really killed it for me so I'd be all for a reimagining over a port or whatever, any day.
Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
Cyph




Status: Offline
Joined: 17 Apr 2008
Posts: 3977
$poons: 716.80
Location: Perth, WA
australia.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
1

Vote:
mikezilla2
'reimaging'... on the Wii? So they're doing a port then? ZING! icon_wink.gif
Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message
A13x




Status: Offline
Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 3362
$poons: 2126.10
Location: Adelaide
australia.gif

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Score:
1

Vote:
mikezilla2
Just for reference, I compiled a chart showing Eurocom and N-Space's Games since 1997 versus their average review scores.

Eurocom Average Game Ratings since '97


N-Space Average Game Ratings since '97


Rare Ltd. Average Game Ratings since '97


Developer comparison

_________________

<3
Back to top
Trade $poons with user View users profile Send private message Visit posters website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked you cannot post, reply to or edit topics   This topic is locked you cannot edit posts or make replies    PAL Gaming Network Forum Index
   -> General Forums, Archive
All times are GMT + 11 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to: 
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum