| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JP2daMC


Status: Offline Joined: 09 Jul 2008 Posts: 952 $poons: 152.40

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:36 am Post subject: An R rating would protect children |
|
|
|
|
| An R rating would protect children by Jason |  | | PALGN Feature: Michael Atkinson is right to want to protect children, he's just going about it the wrong way. | | [View Article] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mattstep


Status: Offline Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 1455 $poons: 408.20 Location: Melbourne

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Awesome. I was wondering when the "everyone plays" initiative was going to kick off.
I'll sure as hell be doing my bit! _________________
ALL THINGS PILKINGTON
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Windburn


Status: Offline Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 1302 $poons: 222.60 Location: Melbourne, Victoria

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Excellent arguments, Jason. Your reasoning is very well thought out and clearly expressed- essentially it's a bulletproof editorial that should be brought to the attention of everyone concerned with this issue.
If more people take heed of Jason's example in the way they express their arguments, then we'll have a much more respected and valid position from which to challenge the archaic stereotypes that these ministers rely upon. Essentially, as gamers, our biggest challenge is being taken seriously.
We need to band together and take affirmative action to draw our local representatives' attentions to this topic if we really give a damn about effecting change in our ratings system. _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darius

Status: Offline Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 7 $poons: 0.00
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the post, Jason Could you link us to all of Atkinson's statements on the issue? I see quite a few responses but not much of Atkinson's opinion.
I may have some opportunities to discuss the issue with Atkinson over the next few months - I met him recently.
If I can put the R18+ Games Classification case to him in person, it'd be good to know what I'm talking about At the very least I hope to find out what makes the anti-R18+ force strong enough to warrant SA standing out of line with every other state on the issue, when it seems like the public is broadly supportive of an R18+ rating for games.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
waz79

Status: Offline Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 465 $poons: 11.20
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
If Madworld gets banned it will sell a lot of copies.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
renegadesx


Status: Offline Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 1599 $poons: 28.60 Location: Canberra

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Great article, and your heart is in the right place, unfortunately you are giving Atkinson too much credit.
His heart is not in the right place, I for one do not believe for a single second that Atkinson cares about the children. He personally doesn't like these games so he will keep them banned if possible, the "if I don't like it you cant have it" mentality of the social conservative.
Do not forget for a second that Atkinson is a politician and this move hives him power and puts his name in the papers... no publicity is bad publicity. His arguments have been openly refuted time and time again and he keeps on making the same ones dismissing any refutations as propaganda from the publishers (despite it comes more from the consumers) and accusing Bond University of being bought off when it conducted its survey, when it went over Atkinson's head and asked the public what it thinks.
He uses strawmen and tautologies and has no interest in rational arguments.
Atkinson: The new Jack Thompson _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fetidchimp


Status: Offline Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 8666 $poons: 60.20

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Have to agree with that, he tells massive exaggerations for political gain, he has even admitted that his own kids play these games, so if he can't control his own household, then why the fuck does he think he can control the rest of us. _________________ kill, kill, kill.....the white man. Kill the white man, kill
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr Waffle

Status: Offline Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 514 $poons: 32.80

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Agree completely. A woman at my work bought GTA4 for her 12 year old son last christmas; when we asked her why she thought it'd be ok for him to play such a violent game, she said "he's mature for his age" (so a game for 15 year olds is fine).
My bet is all the Little Timmys of the world with MA15+ games sitting next to their consoles fall into the same category. Every parent thinks their child is grown up enough to handle an MA15+ title. But maybe some would think twice about an R18+ title...
(Though frankly I doubt Atkinson will ever change his mind; he seems hell-bent on standing his ground, with his only real response being 'if you don't like it, fight me for my job '...)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lapzod

Status: Offline Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 2133 $poons: 555.70 Location: Melbourne

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Good read.
Though I have to disagree with you completely renegadesx, and I will type something up later in reply.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dani


Status: Offline Joined: 06 Aug 2008 Posts: 1197 $poons: 698.00 Location: Adelaide

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
Very well written, Jason... the most mature article or letter I've read so far besides the 55 year old grandpa gamer. We need more respectable opinions like this coming from younger gamers in the community, to set a better example for each other, and leave a better impression on parents and non-gaming communities. Assuming you are under 55...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kaiden

Status: Offline Joined: 28 Apr 2006 Posts: 378 $poons: 18.40 Location: Adelaide

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25205567-2682,00.html
From the above link :
"Ms Nelson also lashed out at laws governing mentally ill offenders subject to supervision orders, saying she had warned Attorney-General Michael Atkinson of a looming "disaster".
Wyatt, 24, killed his son, 2, and stabbed his partner, 21, and baby daughter before fatally stabbing himself in the family's Charlson St home at Davoren Park at 2am on Monday.
"I was just horrified because I think they are two deaths that needn't have happened and one of them is a child and I think that is appalling," Ms Nelson said."
All I can say is that by wasting time refusing to get the classification system reworked, you could have concentrated on more important things which could have prevented this.
My point is that once the R18+ was approved and done with, your time and energy could be used on more imporant matters. I think that death would negate any exposure to inappropriate material wouldn't it? _________________ Buy Left 4 Dead 2 (Uncut X360) at Play-Asia.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nietzsche


Status: Offline Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 2543 $poons: 119.80 Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Earth

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
An R rating would protect children: "Well duh"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Genius

Status: Offline Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 841 $poons: 78.00

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
More and more gamers are already tired of the R18 issue. And as long as games like AAA titles like RE5 , MadWorld are being classified, many more won't care.
I mean, kids are becoming more and more smarter and techservy these days. So by the time they are 13 or 14 they know how and where to get porn and violent stuff.
Infact there are more harmful things on TV than violent games.
12 year old girls are already throwing up and becoming bulimic because they want the kind of bodies they see on America's Next Top Model.
You have so much sex, drugs violence in shows like Underbelly that come in the evening, so even without games kids have access to so much filth that violent games are mild stuff to what they see on a daily basis on the net and TV.
By the time kids are 13 they know that stuff in games is fake. So many will not act out that stuff.
Toy guns are some of the most popular toys. So kids are already being fed violent stuff from other means besides games.
I would like an R18 yes, but violent games are only a drop in the ocean in terms of filth kids see everyday.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rufati

Status: Offline Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 314 $poons: 15.20 Location: Western Suburbs, Sydney

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I just wish he'd stop holding up the public consultation on the matter. It's sad that the minority can slow things down like this in a democracy =/ _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
choinkees

Status: Offline Joined: 27 Nov 2007 Posts: 53 $poons: 2.20 Location: my chair

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Brilliant article, and the EveryonePlays site is good too.
Here's hoping we can get an R18 classification by the time Heavy Rain comes out. I don't even know if even the preview tech demo would be allowed here - being chased and potentially gruesomly killed by a disturbing taxidermist who keeps stuffed dead women in his house for amusement.. might be a bit too much for an MA15? _________________ -- stuff I've made -- games, music, short film and animation -- www.rickyvuckovic.com -- enjoy!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Benza


Status: Offline Joined: 11 Mar 2008 Posts: 14586 $poons: 119.20

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| The Genius wrote: |
I mean, kids are becoming more and more smarter |
...
Have you sent this to Atkinson? Cause it's a great argument that he really should read.
I would love to see a public debate about this with him.
He keeps saying he is prepared to defend his stance, someone should challenge him. _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lennex15


Status: Offline Joined: 15 Mar 2008 Posts: 450 $poons: 147.60 Location: Melbourne

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
You can only exercise choice by knowing all the facts.
Without R18 we are consistently misinformed and make enforced ingnorant decisions.
This is the case of the OFLC as well as the public.
Let's hope that constructed argument and evidence prevails and conservative misinformed opinions are changed through education. _________________
Döppel+Sig+Avatar=Kyser Soze+Respect
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Genius

Status: Offline Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 841 $poons: 78.00

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Benza wrote: |
He keeps saying he is prepared to defend his stance, someone should challenge him. |
Unfortunately Atkinson is an Utlra-Conservative.
Yeah he is prepared to debate, but nothing can change his stance.
An R18 rating will come in the future, but that's when Atkinson has left politics.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Benza


Status: Offline Joined: 11 Mar 2008 Posts: 14586 $poons: 119.20

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| The Genius wrote: | | Benza wrote: |
He keeps saying he is prepared to defend his stance, someone should challenge him. |
Unfortunately Atkinson is an Utlra-Conservative.
Yeah he is prepared to debate, but nothing can change his stance.
An R18 rating will come in the future, but that's when Atkinson has left politics. |
The purpose of a public debate isn't so much to change the other persons oppinos, it's to inform the public of the debate and give a fair coverage to both sides of the arguments.
At the moment the only place the alternative is being presented is on game websites, lots of preaching to the converted. A public debate with someone from the Australian Gaming community, so say one of the writers from here, or Yug or Matt from Australian Gamers or something would present the argument to a greater amount of people. _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LabMouse

Status: Offline Joined: 20 Mar 2009 Posts: 1 $poons: 0.00
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Mr Waffle wrote: | | (Though frankly I doubt Atkinson will ever change his mind; he seems hell-bent on standing his ground, with his only real response being 'if you don't like it, fight me for my job '...) |
his job is representation of the people....change the minds of the people and he will have to submit to their ideologies or face losing his seat.
the other thing is this, and this is the only valid point Atkinson makes, kids will get their pudgy little fingers on it anyway, and there's several reasons for this.
there is more fear from retailers of fines for selling a game before a certain date than there is of a fine for selling a game to a minor. There are systems in supermarkets that monitor the sales of cigarettes. Start asking people for ID in games stores when they bring up a MA15+ game and they look under 25.
the big key is making parents more aware of what they child is doing. there has been government campaign asking parents "what is your child looking at on the internet?", but nothing with regards to what their kid might be playing in the middle of the lounge room.
greater awareness in parents AND better methods of sales in video games might actually change the minds of the people who the politicians represent
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
renegadesx


Status: Offline Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 1599 $poons: 28.60 Location: Canberra

|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Benza wrote: | I would love to see a public debate about this with him.
He keeps saying he is prepared to defend his stance, someone should challenge him. |
But he doesn't. He wants to stick to his same arguments and when people put figures infront of him he dismisses them as business interests and plays the faith over facts card.
He has been killing the public consultation process because he knows the public disagrees with him, he doesn't like that because he like Jack truly believes he is right and everyone else is wrong and facts wont change that... the old George Bush "gut" feeling.
He doesnt want public opinion, otherwise he would let the public consultation go ahead, letting it go ahead doesn't mean a commitment or imply an intention to go ahead with the rating change, its simply censoring the masses from having a say.
His style is very predictable for a conservative, the self-righteous "I'm better than you, I'm wiser than you, I'm more moral than you so I'm right no matter what the facts say, its for your own good" mentality that so many aristocrats have adopted over many millenia.
With that and the net censorship and phone call screening and threatening fines to people that want their legit web sites to be taken off the AMCA blacklist... and this is only the small stuff.
Not to mention the UK openly slapping down free speech, the US Patriot Act and similar copycats... George Orwell must be turning in his grave.
| lapzod wrote: | | Though I have to disagree with you completely renegadesx, and I will type something up later in reply. |
Cant wait  _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fetidchimp


Status: Offline Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 8666 $poons: 60.20

|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I issue a challenge to Atkinson - Provide me with proof that censorship ever curtailed one of societies ills or stopped even one person from going out and committing a crime. _________________ kill, kill, kill.....the white man. Kill the white man, kill
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
izzzbo

Status: Offline Joined: 23 Mar 2009 Posts: 15 $poons: 0.40

|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Nice article. Though I believe gamers in Australia have made plenty of noise about banning our favourite games due to material not fit for our rating systems.
If politicians did go out there and talked to genuine gamers instead of parents who have no idea about gaming, they would have come up with a solution a long time ago.
It's like asking a beer drinker to test try wine.
Violence was around way before video games. But now they have something to blame it on.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Karai Pantsu PALGN Moderator


Status: Offline Joined: 17 Aug 2006 Posts: 10109 $poons: 29.06 Location: Melbexico

|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| izzzbo wrote: | If politicians did go out there and talked to genuine gamers instead of parents who have no idea about gaming, they would have come up with a solution a long time ago.
It's like asking a beer drinker to test try wine. |
Actually, ~90% of Australia Adults (including non-gamers) polled believe that introducing an R18+ rating to games is a good idea (to paraphrase previous articles, Everyoneplays.org.au, etc.). There is only one person in government holding this back. It is ridiculous. _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Adeptus


Status: Offline Joined: 14 May 2007 Posts: 22 $poons: 3.20

|
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| renegadesx wrote: | | Not to mention the UK openly slapping down free speech, the US Patriot Act and similar copycats... George Orwell must be turning in his grave. |
No, just screaming "I told you so!"
(and only 25 years behind schedule)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|