| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
izzzbo

Status: Offline Joined: 23 Mar 2009 Posts: 15 $poons: 0.40

|
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Karai Pantsu wrote: | | Actually, ~90% of Australia Adults (including non-gamers) polled believe that introducing an R18+ rating to games is a good idea (to paraphrase previous articles, Everyoneplays.org.au, etc.). There is only one person in government holding this back. It is ridiculous. |
This 1 guy should not be able to force this law all by himself then? The government should work for the people. If we vote for something we want, THEY HAVE TO GO BY THE WINNING VOTE. If we took this guy to court I'm sure we can win the case.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pixelatedgames


Status: Offline Joined: 17 Dec 2008 Posts: 840 $poons: 3.20 Location: In her own little world ...

|
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Alright ... Mike here at work is around 50 something? And I was just talking to him about the R18+ issue.
I was telling him about Manhunt. I said "I'm a female, normal in most ways, but you know what? I like this sort of game" and went on to talk about other games (GTA etc)
His reply? .... "hmmm they should ban the games, and not let them into the country atall so the kids don't get their hands on them"
I then went on to tell him about the mother who bought her 12yr old GTA IV and said "He's mature for his age" and the mother probably had no idea what the child was playing, only that they asked for it so the mother bought it.
I was telling him perhaps there should be stricter policies on who can buy the games (photo ID etc) and perhaps parents being more aware of what their children are playing. I brought up points about movies and tv shows with ratings and restrictions for the reasons of violence and sex, swearing etc etc etc and why this wouldn't work the same for games?
Mike still thinks these games should be banned and not allowed into the country atall. And that I'll just have to miss out on the game.
*frustrated* _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ObsoletE


Status: Offline Joined: 30 Sep 2003 Posts: 20357 $poons: 34.20 Location: Perth, WA :: Jubei'Thos

|
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
well, presumably he runs for office on topics other than backwards logic, this just happens to be 1 part of his overall ticket.
everything else he stands for might be completely logical and rational, and even beneficial to his electorate, but in voting for those things, voters also vote for this nugget of annoyance. like it or not, the rating issue probably isn't really a major issue for most people.
(note: i've actually got no idea what his other policies are, but they must be somewhat popular for him to continually be voted in.) _________________
My Play-Asia Affiliate Link.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fetidchimp


Status: Offline Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 8666 $poons: 60.20

|
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
He did outlaw bikie gangs and i'm pretty sure he got lot's of plaudits for that.
Basically belonging to any bikie gang in SA makes you a criminal automatically i believe. _________________ kill, kill, kill.....the white man. Kill the white man, kill
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qbert


Status: Offline Joined: 29 Mar 2005 Posts: 4541 $poons: 209.00 Location: Guayaquil

|
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
^Wow that is beyond stupid if true, possibly on par with being as stupid as banning R18 games, but luckly I have no desire to join a bikie gang.
Actually it's not quite as stupid, it would be more like instead of banning bikie gangs, making the members who are considered highly dangerous by every western country bar Australia to go and ride around on BMX bikes with kids who just turned 15. _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
renegadesx


Status: Offline Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 1599 $poons: 28.60 Location: Canberra

|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Adeptus wrote: | | renegadesx wrote: | | Not to mention the UK openly slapping down free speech, the US Patriot Act and similar copycats... George Orwell must be turning in his grave. |
No, just screaming "I told you so!"
(and only 25 years behind schedule) |
You do realise Orwell has been dead for almost 60 years _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
avjamash

Status: Offline Joined: 22 May 2008 Posts: 45 $poons: 2.40
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey guys, I just had a thought. I was thinking, if we introduce R18+ we will see what, 3 games more a year max? With games slipping into the MA15+ category, it means more sales on games. I know would sell allot less GTA (all of em) if it were R18+ because as it stands, parents are allowed to buy these for their kids, thus generating healthier sales. I actually am now not sure if I want R18+ for games, because if it does get implemented, sales of some game would literally drop and drop hard because ignorant parents will then not buy them for their kids. Maybe we aught to consider leaving this system as it is for the sake of sale and economy? What do you think? Perhaps this could be Michael Atkinson's secret hidden agenda as to why he is stopping R18+? if it is, very clever and not as dumb as I thought you were Michael Atkinson.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Island_Wolf


Status: Offline Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 3126 $poons: 849.10 Location: Sydney

|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| avjamash wrote: | | I actually am now not sure if I want R18+ for games, because if it does get implemented, sales of some game would literally drop and drop hard because ignorant parents will then not buy them for their kids. |
Can't see how is that ignorant on the parents part. One of the major reason why Michael Atkinson didn't want R18+ because it was children may get its hand on it through an adult or other means. Its his way of trying to protect the kids, is it right or wrong, I won't judge his decisions. The ratings are there as guidelines for parents to follow. Whatever the parents do is up to them whether or not to follow the rating.
I agree there would be a lot less sale of GTA, but it will get it sales back when the people who can't get it turns to a legal age to obtain it. So there might just be a 3 years period of lower than usual cash flow but it is only for a minority of games anyway. And remember this is just Australia too, it shouldn't be too devastating on the accounting report for the publishers, but gaming stores can hold on for 3 years.
Edit - about the economy _________________ "Work hard now, play even harder later"
I am an Industry Ambassador at Girl Geek Coffees (Sydney)
Unofficial PALGNchat - IRC Client *New Server!*
Last edited by Island_Wolf on Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Benza


Status: Offline Joined: 11 Mar 2008 Posts: 14586 $poons: 119.20

|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Maybe we aught to consider leaving this system as it is for the sake of sale and economy? |
No _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
avjamash

Status: Offline Joined: 22 May 2008 Posts: 45 $poons: 2.40
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
Ok Island wolf, i hear you , but dont you see he is either dumb or blind for blocking R18+? thats the point i am trying to make here, and as a retailer, i sell a parent gta (or something similar) for their under 13 year old (and as young as 5) at least 3 or 4 times a week, and at release? it was as much as 2 or 3 a day average over a few weeks. so waiting 3 years? some maybe waiting 10 years before they are of legal age to purchase. These parents are either ignorant, or don't give a SH!T. And you fail to bring to argument that THE GAMES ARE ALL READY HERE, GTA should be R18+ and Fallout 3, the list can go forever, but with R18+ its restricted like PORN, give to kids, and your in trouble. Most of you argue for R18+ to get the games, I want it to stop these idiot parents buying 5 year olds GTA and Kane & Lynch, or Saints Row. I over it, i posted what i did earlier to prove a point, to show how dumb this is. I honestly don't think we will get many more games by having an R18+ as there are still set criteria to block particular content (currently in use for MA15+ or giving a game RC) So if we get R18+ chances are, that content will still be BANNED. but overall, the games that are slipping through at MA15+ will hopefully be correctly classified into R18+. Do you understand yet? no? well stop playing games and educate your mind a little. Im MASH, im 24, i sell games, and im sick of selling ADULT games to parents for their 5 to 12 y.o. kids. Even after i warn half of em, i just gave up and sell them the game now. (to the parents that is). I can argue all day, why? cuz im angry!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Benza


Status: Offline Joined: 11 Mar 2008 Posts: 14586 $poons: 119.20

|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
So basicly what you're saying is
"Hey don't mind me encroaching your personal freedoms, it makes more profit in the end so it's all good"
Yeah... how about no? _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slewis69au

Status: Offline Joined: 31 Mar 2009 Posts: 1 $poons: 0.00
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Atkinson is disingenuous to say the least. All of his arguments have been completely refuted.
When he is confronted with this he rubs his fingers together childishly and accuses everyone of being motivated by money. Which in itself is an argument that has been refuted - we are talking about 3-6 games a year here! Hardly enough money for people to be going around commissioning surveys and rallying public opinion.
He is blocking public consultation because he thinks he knows better - he does not. It really is that simple. Support organisations like Everyone Plays and get this into the mainstream.
And stop sending the guy abusive e-mails and letters - he loves them and uses them as an example of why Australian gamers cannot be trusted. He makes my blood boil too but he is thriving on the abuse and using it to further his cause!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fetidchimp


Status: Offline Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 8666 $poons: 60.20

|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
i think we do support everyone plays around here for some reason... _________________ kill, kill, kill.....the white man. Kill the white man, kill
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mrbign


Status: Offline Joined: 01 May 2008 Posts: 49 $poons: 1.60 Location: Bendigo

|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
As a gamer I might surprise many of you by being against R18+ - probably not for the reason you think. In the US they generally make games to target a low classification because it hurts sales going to T or R or whatever. If we have R18+ here there could be a lot of games being nobbled to ensure MA instead of R. Gamers already complain about the GTA4 cuts but they could get worse to avoid the new R rating. The other effect could be what happened with Nintendo Australia during the GameCube era where they just didn't bother releasing some games here - TimeSplitters 3.
I'm socially responsible as well as selfish though and I agree with avjamash and the article that MA15+ means nothing to parents with regards to videogames. I believe Mr Atkinson is completely wrong by saying no R18+ for games is protecting children because like avjamash's anecdotal evidence says, parents are the ones buying the games most of the time.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Benza


Status: Offline Joined: 11 Mar 2008 Posts: 14586 $poons: 119.20

|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Quote: | | As a gamer I might surprise many of you by being against R18+ - probably not for the reason you think. In the US they generally make games to target a low classification because it hurts sales going to T or R or whatever. If we have R18+ here there could be a lot of games being nobbled to ensure MA instead of R. |
Games are usualy cut content wise to avoid an R rating in the US as Wallmart, who is one of there biggest retailers refuse to shelf an R rated products. As far as I'm aware we don't have that situation here. _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qbert


Status: Offline Joined: 29 Mar 2005 Posts: 4541 $poons: 209.00 Location: Guayaquil

|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
^And on top of that, how many people make games primaraly for the Austrlaian market? _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mrbign


Status: Offline Joined: 01 May 2008 Posts: 49 $poons: 1.60 Location: Bendigo

|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Benza wrote: | | As far as I'm aware we don't have that situation here. |
Correct, we don't because we don't have any R rated games. R rated games would have to be kept in cabinets like R rated movies currently are in big reatilers. That adds cost and affects margins.
| Qbert wrote: | | how many people make games primaraly for the Australaian market? |
I don't mean they're made for here and that's the problem. Instead they'll be shoehorned into our ratings.
These things will hurt sales and may lead to some retailers not stocking them which could in turn lead to a)distributors not bothering because we're such a small market, or more likely b)games which would just fall into R rating getting cut like they currently do. Fully R games would probably stay R. Just possible outcomes as I see it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fetidchimp


Status: Offline Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 8666 $poons: 60.20

|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Only one way to find out...... _________________ kill, kill, kill.....the white man. Kill the white man, kill
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ObsoletE


Status: Offline Joined: 30 Sep 2003 Posts: 20357 $poons: 34.20 Location: Perth, WA :: Jubei'Thos

|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| mrbign wrote: | | Benza wrote: | | As far as I'm aware we don't have that situation here. |
Correct, we don't because we don't have any R rated games. R rated games would have to be kept in cabinets like R rated movies currently are in big reatilers. That adds cost and affects margins. |
with the exception of those R-rated porn titles (Playboy DVDs etc.), i've never seen a big retailer housing R-rated DVDs behind glass, or away from the "regular" DVDs.
however, i don't think it's a bad idea to have such a rule for any R-rating for games. it should at least promote carding of customers looking to buy them, something that is supposed to happen for R-rated DVDs/Books (etc.), yet doesn't. _________________
My Play-Asia Affiliate Link.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jemborg

Status: Offline Joined: 27 Jan 2009 Posts: 3 $poons: 0.00

|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Sorry to be so late in replying...
Your article was good, well argued. I have thought this before but it was put together quite cogently. But Atkinson does not really state what he really wants, he only hints at it.
He wants power, SA is rather a police state. He doesn't want to protect the children... he wants to "protect" ALL of us, from ourselves. He wants control over the CONTENT of all videogames, e.g. Resident Evil 5 (he proudly states he's had it, and others, censored here). This he would lose with an "R" classification.
It's pretty damn obvious he will never listen to "thoughtful considered reasoning" on anyone's part since this is his actual agenda. He's not misguided or stupid... he's laughing at you/us.
PS: He's just a turd. _________________ It's a lot easier being righteous than right.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sinthesys


Status: Offline Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 2968 $poons: 58.00 Location: Perth

|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| renegadesx wrote: | | Adeptus wrote: | | renegadesx wrote: | | Not to mention the UK openly slapping down free speech, the US Patriot Act and similar copycats... George Orwell must be turning in his grave. |
No, just screaming "I told you so!"
(and only 25 years behind schedule) |
You do realise Orwell has been dead for almost 60 years |
I believe he's referring to his work '1984'. _________________
GT: Da Herbalist - Keep on Choppin'
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|