| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Luke Mitchell
Status: Offline
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 655
$poons: 0.00
Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:30 pm Post subject: Deadly Creatures Preview |
|
|
 |
|
| Deadly Creatures Preview by Luke |  | | Wii Preview: It's creepy, it's crawly... it's deadly. But how's it looking so far? | | [View Article] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
?oe?oe
Status: Offline
Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 3776
$poons: 114.00
Location: NSW
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I'm intrigued by the game, it certainly could be that sleeper hit. I loved the way you talked about it in the second paragraph, but what kind of game structure would you compare it to? Is it more of a traditional level structure ie: A to B, or is it more open ie: A to B but continues to C to D?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin Ogaris
Status: Offline
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 10616
$poons: 1588.60
Location: Melbourne
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Interesting, this could definitely be a winner. It's interesting in that it sounds like, on paper, any other sort of 3d brawler, but I think the setting itself will make the game fresh, and a cut above your standard human brawler, just for the sheer thrill of watching insects and arachnids battle it out.
Of course, when I initially saw the title I had the old Microsoft educational title in my mind and was wondering if there was a remake of that in the works... that was fun.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Luke Mitchell
Status: Offline
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 655
$poons: 0.00
Location: Melbourne
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| joejoe wrote: | | I'm intrigued by the game, it certainly could be that sleeper hit. I loved the way you talked about it in the second paragraph, but what kind of game structure would you compare it to? Is it more of a traditional level structure ie: A to B, or is it more open ie: A to B but continues to C to D? |
It's more of a traditional structure from what I could tell, but we did only experience a couple of levels, and they were the beginning ones. It seems like it would have the opportunity to branch out when the space you're playing in becomes larger in terms of 'what do I do next?', but we were tunnel-bound for the preview itself, so we'll have to wait and see I guess!  I hope that sort-of-somewhat answers your question.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Daniel Golding
Status: Offline
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 473
$poons: 230.10
Location: Melbourne
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
This is all very well, but now I can't look at the front page, as I'm horribly arachnophobic. 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
?oe?oe
Status: Offline
Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 3776
$poons: 114.00
Location: NSW
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Luke Mitchell wrote: | | joejoe wrote: | | I'm intrigued by the game, it certainly could be that sleeper hit. I loved the way you talked about it in the second paragraph, but what kind of game structure would you compare it to? Is it more of a traditional level structure ie: A to B, or is it more open ie: A to B but continues to C to D? |
It's more of a traditional structure from what I could tell, but we did only experience a couple of levels, and they were the beginning ones. It seems like it would have the opportunity to branch out when the space you're playing in becomes larger in terms of 'what do I do next?', but we were tunnel-bound for the preview itself, so we'll have to wait and see I guess! I hope that sort-of-somewhat answers your question. |
Thanks, that did. I guess we have to wait and see how exactly the game will flow.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rush152
Status: Offline
Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Posts: 160
$poons: 4.20
Location: Sydney
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
