Fallout 3 passes classification

it annoys me that we're left to guess what was changed.

surely when someone submits an altered item for re-review, they would have to submit the reasons for the first submission being refused (or why it received a higher rating) along with a sheet of how they've addressed these things.

why can't the OFLC make these details public?

it'd sure as s**t go a long way to providing providence on their decisions, and improving the public's opinion on their choices, imo.
(i understand that the GTA4 changes were different in that no prior submission was rejected, but in this case there was.)

on the article's contents though - looks like it might be purely cosmetic. although i do wonder because a lot of those chem names i'm pretty sure were present in the older fallouts, and if this is true, was this really an altered submission, or did they appeal the initial decision using precedents set in older reviews and, you know, logic?
(i'm aware the statement says it's a revised version, i'm asking if this line is correct.)

given the chem names are so Fallout 1/2 sounding, makes me wonder if these were really changed, and what the actual revisions to the game really are.
(note - the statement still refers to "proscribed drugs" which to me implies that Morphine is still called Morphine.)