Home
Twitter
RSS
Newsletter
Anthony Capone
10 Jul, 2008

Why Fallout 3 was refused classification

PS3 News | OFLC details why the game was effectively banned.
Yesterday we revealed the news that Fallout 3 had been refused classification in Australia. It was initially unclear why Bethesda's highly anticipated RPG had been blocked, but Australian Gamer has posted the report outlining the OFLC's decision.

The Board Report details various laws and guidelines, and consequently, why Fallout 3 was refused classification.

Firstly, the majority of the Board state:
Quote:
"Computer games that ... depict, express or otherwise deal with sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent the that they should not be classified;" will be Refused Classification.

The report says "material that contains drug use and sexual violence related to incentives and rewards is Refused Classification". In applying this to Fallout 3, the Board state:
Quote:
The game contains the option to take a variety of "chems" using a device which is connected to the character's arm. Upon selection of the device a menu selection screen is displayed. Upon this screen is a list of "chems" that the player can take, by means of selection. These "chems" have positive effects and some negative effects (lowering of intelligence, or the character may become addicted to the "chem"). The positive effects include increase in strength, stamina, resistance to damage, agility and hit points. Corresponding with the list of various "chems" are small visual representation of the drugs, these include syringes, tablets, pill bottles, a crack-type pipe and blister packs. In the Board's view these realistic visual representations of drugs and their delivery method bring the "science-fiction" drugs in line with "real-world" drugs.

The report explains that "chems are an essential element of Fallout 3". In particular:
Quote:
The player can also select and use "Morphine" (a proscribed drug) which has the effect of enabling the character to ignore limb pain when the character's extremities are targeted by the enemy.

Ultimately, the Board believes Fallout 3 promotes or encourages proscribed drug use:
Quote:
In the Board's view the drug use in particular the use of a proscribed drug, via means of selection from a menu, is related to incentives and rewards as the incentives to take the drugs is to progress through the game more easily and the reward is an increase in the character's abilities and as such [Fallout 3] is Refused Classification.

The Board also considered the level of violence in Fallout 3, but came to a different conclusion on the issue:
Quote:
The Board notes that the violence throughout the game could be accommodated at an MA 15+ level of classification.

When the OFLC refuse a game classification, the effect is that it may not be advertised, sold, hired or demonstrated within Australian borders.

Comparisons between the OFLC's decision and MA 15+ classified games with similar content are already being debated, but for the time being, the future of Fallout 3 in Australia looks unclear. Whether or not a modified version of the game makes it way to our shores, as will be the case with Dark Sector, only time will tell. However, one thing is certain – the fallout of this decision is likely to be felt far and wide.

Stay tuned to PALGN for further news on Fallout 3 as it develops.

Related Fallout 3 Content

Game over for Fallout 3
18 Aug, 2009 You'd retire too after having five babies.
Fallout 3 Mothership Zeta released
04 Aug, 2009 The truth is out there.
PS3 Fallout 3 DLC coming in September
14 Jul, 2009 Broken Steel will come first.
34 Comments
3 years ago
Benza wrote
What gets me is this has had what, 5 diffrent topics now? Two in here, and three in the general games discussion.

But when shellshocked got RCed everyong just went "Eh"
Well Fallout 3 was an anticipated title due to the popularity of the previous Fallout ttiles and game retailers such as EB and GAME had promoted this title for people to go and pre-order. This is why there has been so much discussion on this issue.

I honestly don't know of anyone who was anticipating Shellshock icon_wink.gif
3 years ago
Neo.Sanity wrote
Fetidchimp wrote
neo.sanity wrote
As for a solution? Well 300 signatures is hardly going to make tomorrow's headlines, but if your the adventurous types that feels compelled to do so consider the following.
- Stand under a heavy falling projectile.
- Write to your local councilmen to discuss current interactive media legislation and discuss a possible amendment to be legislation.
- Reconsider my first proposition.
That's some good advice, don't like a govenrnement decision, then go home and die. *slow hand clap for most bull **** thing written on forum*

Censorship is a frivoulous topic? wow
Frivolous, yes, considering that climate change, economic stability, petrol prices and corruption are the policies that change the outcomes of elections. Not the illogical legislation that bans these games.

If you want censorship hit up the dozens of other countries that have no qualms about arresting you, beating you and then possibly executing you for insulting their monarchy. There are different degrees of censorship, this just happens to be about as gentle as it gets.
From little things big things grow.......but hey someone has to hand out the tut tuts without offering a solution. I don't live in those other countries, i live in this one, i don't have the option of trying to help those countries beyond some wave of my magic wallet. I only have the option of trying to do something for this one.

And i made the point over shellshock also, perceived lack of quality (i wouldn't know because i don't have the option to find out) should not be a reason to say, whats that? it was probably **** anyway, ok please censor more for us.
3 years ago
TheAnswer wrote
Well Fallout 3 was an anticipated title due to the popularity of the previous Fallout ttiles and game retailers such as EB and GAME had promoted this title for people to go and pre-order. This is why there has been so much discussion on this issue.
The thing is people arn't complaining about not being able to play the game, because everyone will just import it. People are complaining about censorship and the government controlling there choices.


Quote
I honestly don't know of anyone who was anticipating Shellshock icon_wink.gif
I thought it looked pretty cool.
3 years ago
Fetidchimp wrote
Neo.Sanity wrote
Fetidchimp wrote
neo.sanity wrote
As for a solution? Well 300 signatures is hardly going to make tomorrow's headlines, but if your the adventurous types that feels compelled to do so consider the following.
- Stand under a heavy falling projectile.
- Write to your local councilmen to discuss current interactive media legislation and discuss a possible amendment to be legislation.
- Reconsider my first proposition.
That's some good advice, don't like a govenrnement decision, then go home and die. *slow hand clap for most bull **** thing written on forum*

Censorship is a frivoulous topic? wow
Frivolous, yes, considering that climate change, economic stability, petrol prices and corruption are the policies that change the outcomes of elections. Not the illogical legislation that bans these games.

If you want censorship hit up the dozens of other countries that have no qualms about arresting you, beating you and then possibly executing you for insulting their monarchy. There are different degrees of censorship, this just happens to be about as gentle as it gets.
From little things big things grow.......but hey someone has to hand out the tut tuts without offering a solution. I don't live in those other countries, i live in this one, i don't have the option of trying to help those countries beyond some wave of my magic wallet. I only have the option of trying to do something for this one.

And i made the point over shellshock also, perceived lack of quality (i wouldn't know because i don't have the option to find out) should not be a reason to say, whats that? it was probably **** anyway, ok please censor more for us.
I doubt that in our democratic nation censorship will ever become an issue like in other nations. The point I was trying to make is that this is not real censorship, it's more legislation that tries to force a set of morals and ethics on us, look I agree it sucks and it doesn't make sense that a local shop can't sell it but we can import and own an RC title without issue.

Economically and democratically it's very hypocritical though making a little online petition about it and whinging about it on a forum doesn't change a thing. The people who enacted this legislation aren't exactly in swing states so they're not open to the same sort of political bargaining as other leaders.
If you guys want to do anything, approach your local federal parliament member, discuss the topic with them if you get the chance ask them about introducing an amendment to the legislation but outside that your really out of hope.
I don't think many of you guys realize how out of touch some of the politicians are to the legislation they enact and vote upon.
3 years ago
Neo.Sanity wrote
The point I was trying to make is that this is not real censorship, it's more legislation that tries to force a set of morals and ethics on us
So what is real censorship?
3 years ago
@neo.sanity
I get what you're saying, the thing is it really should be stopped before it does become an issue, creeping it's way in as a normally accepted thing.

Also i have done many things in my years against censorship, i am an old metalhead so as you can imagine i have troden this path a few times in the past, i realise that it is usually falling upon deaf ears, but to accept it makes it just that little easier for them next time.
3 years ago
Fetidchimp wrote
@neo.sanity
I get what you're saying, the thing is it really should be stopped before it does become an issue, creeping it's way in as a normally accepted thing.

Also i have done many things in my years against censorship, i am an old metalhead so as you can imagine i have troden this path a few times in the past, i realise that it is usually falling upon deaf ears, but to accept it makes it just that little easier for them next time.
Unlike Americans Australian's seem to be a lot more in tune with politics, so I doubt that any real increase in censorship policies would take place. I mean look at the Australian photographer who almost got charged for his art, a lot of Australians did take to his side about expressing himself and he was able to avoid punishment (Even though he's presented very similar exhibitions before).

@Spanca
Real censorship is more used to protect the government or monarch or a country, blocking out damaging reports and arresting people who speak out against the government. China for example has very real, very strict censorship.
3 years ago
Neo.Sanity wrote
@Spanca
Real censorship is more used to protect the government or monarch or a country, blocking out damaging reports and arresting people who speak out against the government. China for example has very real, very strict censorship.
Now you're confusing censorship with what it's used for. You said we don't have real censorship as what is being done here is the restriction of certain material that does not conform to the proscribed morals or ethics, but that's what censorship is, and is in China where you claim it to be real censorship.
3 years ago
...... What the hell is going on with the 'ask the public, about what WE want?' thing??

this is complete BS
3 years ago
so wait what? if they rename the drugs it will be all good?
Add Comment
Like this news?
Share it with this tiny url: http://palg.nu/xq

N4G : News for Gamers         Twitter This!

Digg!     Stumble This!

| More
  Pre-order or buy:
    PALGN recommends: www.Play-Asia.com

Australian Release Date:
  31/10/2008 (Confirmed)
Standard Retail Price:
  $109.95 AU
Publisher:
  Red Ant
Genre:
  RPG
Year Made:
  2008

Read more...
Currently Popular on PALGN
Australian Gaming Bargains - 08/12/11
'Tis the season to be bargaining.
R18+ Legislation
R18+ Legislation
Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Generations Preview
Hands on time with the game. Chat time with the CEO of CyberConnect 2.
PALGN's Most Anticipated Games of 2007
24 titles to keep an eye on during 2007.
PALGN's Most Anticipated Games of 2008
And you thought 2007 was populated.