Home
Twitter
RSS
Newsletter
Brendan
04 Oct, 2004

State Of Play #7

PALGN Feature | It’s been said before.
And it will no doubt be said again. In both cases, by people far more articulate than myself. But it seems that no matter how many times we say it, yell it and scream it, the powers that be just refuse to listen.

Censorship sucks.

It is everywhere in society. The ‘man’ likes to tell us adults what we can and cannot see. It’s just not fair. But is there anywhere where censorship is more idiotic than games?

After the ruling by the OFLC (the Australian Office for Film & Literature Classification) on Manhunt last week, probably not.

For those unaware, the classification for Manhunt was changed last week from MA15+ to, well, banned.

Whether Manhunt is a good game or not is not the issue (for the record, I thought it was solid enough to get a good score here, but I seem to be the only one who thinks as much). Manhunt is definitely a violent game – indeed, kids shouldn’t be anywhere near it. But honestly, the fact that the OFLC only decided to pull it from shelves TEN MONTHS AFTER ITS INITIAL RELEASE is just freakin’ stupid.

Was it to please little Timmy’s mother, who is scared that he will one day go outside and breath oxygen? Or perhaps it was a knee jerk reaction to the appalling story in the British tabloids that squarely laid the blame of a murder at the feet of Manhunt (further details on this garbage can be read here)?

In any case, the ban will serve no purpose, as basically everybody who wants the game has already played it, beaten it and shelved it MONTHS ago. It looked bad enough when the OFLC pulled Grand Theft Auto III from shelves a few months after release in 2001, but this is just ridiculous. Do the OFLC have any clue at all as to how incompetent (and susceptible to the slightest hint of mainstream media pressure) this makes them look?

Probably not, as they have their heads well and truly buried under a six feet of sand when it comes to listening to anybody who isn’t little Timmy’s mother. They STILL have the view that video games aren’t played by anyone over the age of seventeen, as is illustrated by their continual refusal to introduce an R18+ classification into video games, despite the constant cries from gamers across the country that have been screaming for one for years.

With the coming revamping of the film ratings system, it is just plain ridiculous that they still refuse to budge on this issue. They have the perfect opportunity to do it with no fuss – so why won’t they? Do they believe that adults aren’t capable of deciding what they can and cannot play? Do they believe that violent video games are responsible for the downfall of society? Or perhaps that they will breed terrorism? Whatever the case is, I am – along with countless others – an adult citizen. The fact that they dare tell me I can’t play a video game because it’s too violent downright pisses me off.

In any case, with the impending release of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, and the incompetence of the OFLC that seems to know no boundaries, we could be set to go through this all again.

It’s been said countless times – but censorship just sucks. And until the OFLC realizes that adults play video games too, we could be in for the long haul.

Related Content

Murder by Playstation!!
29 Jul, 2004 The oldest debate in games is back.
Manhunt Banned in New Zealand
15 Dec, 2003 Rockstar's latest hits a censorship hurdle in the land of the long white cloud.
4 Comments
7 years ago
a good article, pity you're pretty much preaching to the choir... icon_smile.gif

this ban was a little different to the recall of GTA3, as in that instance, it was the distributers fault for the recall, not the OFLC... the game received a non-classification in its initial form, rockstar released it anyway, and they got caught...

pretty good marketing strategy that... the fines (if any) and cost of recall was probably worth the free publicity... especially since the recalled units could simply be shipped across the Tasman...

in general, i can see the merits of the classifying of media, but the current game scheme is dumb, especially in this era when the games are no longer toys...
7 years ago
Well, how about some more detail on this? For instance, was any parenting group lobbying to have the game banned? On what criteria do these people work - do they play the game themselves or do they entertain comments from various groups? Plus, what does the local Take 2 distributor have to say about it?

I think there is a more important problem here - how can a game be awarded a certificate and then be banned? It's unusual and prompts me to think there's more invovled here than a simple revision of the content.
7 years ago
As far as I can ascertain, all it took was a Western Australian minister - Michelle Roberts - to question the content of the game. The attorney general (Phillip Ruddock) made the revision of the game happen, and it was banned. This was no doubt incited by the tabloid controversy surrounding the game in Britain.
7 years ago
yeah i don't understand Michelle Roberts' name being attached to it... the first i heard of the investigation into the game, some religious family group in SA were named as the instigators... at least thats how it was reported here...

and now Michelle's getting the credit...

in general though, 3 people (minimum) view a piece of media in order to rate it, the recommendations go to a board who pretty much pass any recommendations made unless they vary wildly in which case the board reviews the subject

then it goes out... and i think for a review to take place, a petition needs to be signed by x amount of people, which is fairly easy when it's usually churches who do the protestations
Add Comment
Like this feature?
Share it with this tiny url: http://palg.nu/2PS

N4G : News for Gamers         Twitter This!

Digg!     Stumble This!

| More
Currently Popular on PALGN
Australian Gaming Bargains - 08/12/11
'Tis the season to be bargaining.
R18+ Legislation
R18+ Legislation
Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Generations Preview
Hands on time with the game. Chat time with the CEO of CyberConnect 2.
PALGN's Most Anticipated Games of 2007
24 titles to keep an eye on during 2007.
PALGN's Most Anticipated Games of 2008
And you thought 2007 was populated.