Home
Twitter
RSS
Newsletter
David Low
23 Feb, 2008

PALGN's scoring system explained

PALGN Feature | A guide to how PALGN approaches scoring.
Here at PALGN we pride ourselves on being tough but fair in our reviews. We make an effort to tell the reader everything they need to know, and to be balanced and as unbiased as possible in our approach to every game in every genre on every platform.

As for our critical philosophy, we place a high emphasis on originality, and games that don't do anything new will not receive the top marks.



The Scores

0 – 1
These scores are reserved for games which have low production values and are in various states of brokenness. If you press right on the controller and it causes the character to move left, that sort of thing. But if a game works, and is generally playable, it should not score this low. It's highly unlikely a knowledgeable gamer would ever buy a game that would score this low.

1½ – 2
Similar to the above, but for slightly less broken games. Games which feature sluggish controls, a poor camera system and which also suck in other ways. These scores can also be used for games which have very little content for the price, and are therefore terrible value.

2½ – 3½
A game in this range will be playable, and for a fan of the genre there may be some possible fun that can be wrung from it. But it will be semi-broken, ugly, far too short, overly simplistic, or all of the above.

4 – 5
A game that almost works, and may have potential, but all is wasted by poor execution. To get this score, a game should have at least one or two redeeming features, and may be some cheap fun if bought at a bargain price.

5½ – 6
To receive these scores, a game will be competent, have nothing major broken, but will be unimaginative, too short, simplistic, ugly, or technically unambitious. These are our base scores for your average semi-competent licenced game.

6½ – 7
Above average. Here we're getting into games that you may actually want to play even if they're not from your preferred genre. Games of these scores or above would be described as 'good' by most gamers. Most people should be able to enjoy this title to some degree if they like the gameplay type or property at all.

7½ – 8
Well above average. Games of these scores or above would be described as 'great' by most gamers. Games that are so good it will be worth going back to play them years later. They will only be brought down by a few minor flaws, or one slightly larger flaw.

8½ – 9
A potential 'game of the year', and a game so good it should be fun for anyone to whom the concept appeals. Graphics, control, sound, presentation and gameplay must all be outstanding for a game to score this high. The only thing holding it back must be that it lacks that 'creative spark' to bring it to the next level of greatness, or it could be a game that has that spark, but is brought down by a few minor technical or artistic flaws.

9½
The best of the best, a must buy title for almost all gamers. State of the art technically, and an artistic marvel. Creative gameplay mechanics, and level design beyond reproach. A game guaranteed to be shortlisted for 'game of the year'.

10
The absolute best. A score only one or two games a generation will receive.


You can also read the list of our all time highest and lowest scored games.

Related Content

Super Mario Galaxy Review
08 Nov, 2007 The gaming galaxy’s brightest star.
Boogie Review
21 Oct, 2007 All singing, all dancing, all the time! Well... maybe not ALL the time...
Rockstar Games presents Table Tennis Preview
04 Oct, 2007 Going through the motions?
30 Comments
6 months ago
Clearly the rating system should go to 11. Only softc@#ks have rating out of 10.

Benza wrote
holy **** I just realised this thread is like three years old.


Jesus man really?
Ha I got suckered too. I was reading down then I was like "omg the infested jibbs, dude you are like the man around here. Is it true you once worked for 67 hours straight".

"It is true. By the end I thought I was some kind of humming bird. In a minute I try to drink nectar out of Sanjay's head"
6 months ago
say what
6 months ago
so there is a change and this thread is bumped because of the connections to this one here?

http://palgn.com.au/viewtopic.php?t=63717&start=25
6 months ago
THEMAN wrote
so there is a change and this thread is bumped because of the connections to this one here?

http://palgn.com.au/viewtopic.php?t=63717&start=25
Cian leaving and the scoring system are unrelated.
6 months ago
The thread is bumped because .me commented on it that the scoring system was broken.
6 months ago
Appel wrote
Yeah, but why would you trust to this guy?


Denny.
(Is actually a picture of Denny)
**** anteaters. Seriously, **** those posers.
Add Comment
Like this feature?
Share it with this tiny url: http://palg.nu/4T8

N4G : News for Gamers         Twitter This!

Digg!     Stumble This!

| More
Currently Popular on PALGN
Australian Gaming Bargains - 08/12/11
'Tis the season to be bargaining.
R18+ Legislation
R18+ Legislation
Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Generations Preview
Hands on time with the game. Chat time with the CEO of CyberConnect 2.
PALGN's Most Anticipated Games of 2007
24 titles to keep an eye on during 2007.
PALGN's Most Anticipated Games of 2008
And you thought 2007 was populated.